This paper experimentally tests the relation between subjects’ competitiveness and bargaining behavior. Bargaining is investigated in a demand-ultimatum game, where the responder can request a share of the pie from the proposer. The re-sults show that highly competitive proposers earn less, since they make lower offers, which are more often rejected. Similarly, highly competitive responders achieve lower payoffs, since they request excessive amounts which induces lower proposals. These findings establish a link between competitiveness and bargaining as suggested by social and evolutionary psychology. Thus, we identify one driver of the empirical heterogeneity of bargaining behavior and outcomes. From a management perspec-tive our findings highlight that giving thought to employees’ competitiveness before delegating them to participate in negotiations may pay off.


 



View the document

Latest Publications

2018S-23 WP
A Laboratory Study of Nudge with Retirement Savings
Dina Tasneem, Audrey Azerot, Marine de Montaignac et Jim Engle-Warnick
View the document

2018s-22 WP
Decision Rules for Precautionary and Retirement Savings
Dina Tasneem et Jim Engle-Warnick
View the document

2018MO-02 MO
Baromètre CIRANO 2018 - La perception des risques au Québec
Ingrid Peignier et Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin
View the document

2018s-20 WP
Long-term Care Risk Misperceptions
M. Martin Boyer, Claude Fluet, Marie-Louise Leroux, Pierre-Carl Michaud et Philippe De Donder
View the document


Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis of Organizations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039
reception@cirano.qc.ca

© 2018 CIRANO. All rights reserved.



Partner of :