It is assumed that research based on empirical data produces factual insight that can be used to guide evidence based policies. However, researchers may tend to specify models based on prior beliefs and construe results accordingly. In this paper, we argue that greater scrutiny is needed along the research process to acknowledge and communicate the limitations of research findings. To illustrate, we review two empirical papers from applied economists aimed at influencing policy. Each paper is analysed to identify how inferences based on prior beliefs are used to specify models and how this impacts the result. Additionally, consideration is given to the sensitivity of results under alternative assumptions. While we do find that the considered papers provide valuable knowledge to the field of agriculture economics, they fail in disclosing the limitations of their results to decision makers, thus undermining considerably their policy relevance. Finally, approaches to increase objectivity in empirical research are considered.

View the document

Latest Publications

2018s-02 WP
The Logic of Collective Action Revisited
Jeannette Brosig-Koch, Timo Heinrich, Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Claudia Keser et Joachim Weimann
View the document

2018s-03 WP
Innovation in Humanitarian Supply Chains: A Systematic Review
Nezih Altay, Graham Heaslip, Gyöngyi Kovács, Karen Spens, Peter Tatham et Alain Vaillancourt
View the document

Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis of Organizations
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400
Montréal, Québec (Canada) H3A 2M8
(514) 985-4000
(514) 985-4039

© 2018 CIRANO. All rights reserved.

Partner of :